Disclosure topic / 04
Regulatory actions include administrative penalties, regulatory measures, warning letters, and other official actions involving disclosure, governance, trading, or compliance issues.
The exact legal stage matters. A prior notice is not a final decision. A risk warning is not the same as a completed delisting.
Connected evidence
Shenzhen Guangdao Digital Technology Co., Ltd. · 920680.BJ (formerly 839680)
A final penalty, major-illegal forced delisting, auditor enforcement and advance compensation show why apparently consistent documents still require independent verification.
Read recordDongxu Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. · 000413.SZ / 200413.SZ
Final decisions connect false financial reporting, related-party fund occupation, securities issuance and gatekeeper failures, while the company’s earlier delisting followed a separate trading-based route.
Read recordJilin Sino-Microelectronics Co., Ltd. · 600360.SH
The company reported full recovery of occupied funds and stronger operating results. Repayment records, cash-flow classification, and tests of revised payment controls answer different parts of the recovery question.
Read recordQingyue Technology and Yuandao Communication · 688496.SH / 301139.SZ
Two CSRC prior-notice cases show why IPO-period financial information, post-listing disclosure, procedural status, and major illegal forced-delisting risk must be read carefully and separately.
Read recordBeijing Oriental Eco-New Energy Co., Ltd. · 002310.SZ
Positive equity returned after restructuring, but losses continued. The proposed renewable-energy purchase would add leverage and goodwill, making its funding and expected cash generation the next test.
Read recordZhongtai Chemical Co., Ltd. · 002092.SZ
After correcting historical revenue and repaying occupied funds, Zhongtai continued to report losses alongside positive operating cash flow. Related-party finance, guarantees, and asset valuations help explain what changed and what remains exposed.
Read record